Talent is Cheaper than Table Salt
Guest Blog post by G. Shawn Hunter
(Author of "Out-Think; How Innovative Leaders Drive Exceptional Outcomes")
“Talent is cheaper than table salt. What separates the
talented individual from the successful one is a lot of hard work.”
- Stephen King, Author
Carol Dweck
led a fascinating study
back in 1998 in which she and her colleagues worked with four hundred 5th
graders and gave them a series of tests, mostly puzzles, and then praised them
in two different ways with these six little words.
With half of the group they said,
“You must be smart at this.”
With the other half of the group they said, “You must have tried really hard.”
In the next round of puzzles, the
kids were offered a choice. They could try harder problems or easier ones. You
guessed right, the kids praised for effort choose to attempt the harder
problems. The kids praised for talent selected the easier problems because when
you praise for innate talent, you create a form of status. If someone believes
they have special talent and they are expected to perform well, then the
thought of failing expectations becomes a liability. So to protect yourself as
a “gifted and talented” individual we will choose easier tasks to ensure we
have high performance.
In the next part of the study both
sets of kids were given harder problems to solve and both sets of kids
performed more poorly. But here’s the interesting thing. When the researchers
asked the kids how they did on the problems, the kids praised for talent lied
40% of the time, presumably to maintain their social status as “talented.”
However, when the other kids praised for effort were asked to tell their peers
how they did on this set of questions, only 10% of them exaggerated their
performance. They felt no loss of self-esteem from doing poorly on difficult
problems.
Here’s where it gets really
interesting. In the next phase of the study, both sets of kids were given
problems comparable to the original set of problems. In terms of difficulty,
this next set was just as challenging as the first. The group praised for
talent had just had an ego setback in the earlier round, and did 20% worse than
they did the first time around. They were told they were smart, then they
performed poorly, and now attacking the same level of difficulty with decreased
confidence they do 20% worse.
But the second group did 30%
better this time around. There’s the difference – 6 words. But keep in mind
there are a lot of ways to say, “You must have tried really hard.”
Carol and her colleagues use these kinds of effort or “process” praise: which is praise for engagement, perseverance, strategies, improvement, etc.
- You really studied for your
English test, and your improvement shows it. You read the material over several
times, outlined it, and tested yourself on it. That really worked!
- I like the way you tried all kinds of strategies on that math problem until you
finally got it.
It was a long, hard assignment, but you stuck to it and got it done. You stayed
at your desk, kept up your concentration, and kept working. That’s great!
- I like that you took on that challenging project for your science class. It
will take a lot of work—doing the research, designing the machine, buying the
parts, and building it. You’re going to learn a lot of great things
G. Shawn Hunter is
the author of OUT THINK: How Innovative Leaders Drive Exceptional
Outcomes, as well as Vice President and Executive Producer for Skillsoft’s
leadership video-learning products.
For
more information, please visit www.shawnhunter.com.
Comments
Post a Comment